Matt Hawkins' Eagles scraped into the USA 7s winner's bracket, thereby climbing to 13th in the 7s World Series standings with 3 tour stops left.
As many as 8 teams on the circuit face the prospect of falling below 12th and so missing automatic qualification for all of the 2013-14 circuit. Perhaps not coincidentally, only a dozen teams will qualify for 2016's Summer Games 7s tournament, so missing next year's cut would be foreboding.
In Las Vegas, won by South Africa for the 2d time in 3 years, Folau Niua's conversion of Nick Edwards' try on the last play of Saturday's 22-7 pool-match win over Spain earned the US pool D's runnerup postion. Despite dropping matches to Australia and Samoa, 26-7 and 12-7 respectively, the Eagles advanced based on aggregrate points differential and so claimed 10 series points, lifting the season's total to 28.
Following a credible 21-19 quarterfinal defeat to Fiji, the Eagles could have nabbed at least 2 more, but squandered the winnable plate semifinal against Canada, 24-19 in overtime.
Poor tackling led to a 19-7 second-half deficit; failing to convert a centered try left the US tied at full time. After Zack Test's 4th-minute touchdown brought America to within 7, Luke Hume identified Niua many yards away, and seeking to conserve time, stepped up to take the normally automatic extras. The sensible tactic failed as Hume steered the ball underneath the crossbar.
Should this year's campaign falter, it may be tempting to cite Hume's miscue as the turning point. It will not be.
In next month's Hong Kong and Japan tournaments and May's Scotland event in May, there is ample opportunity to pass 12th-placed Scotland, 5 points ahead of the US; the Wallabies, 7 points ahead; and even the Maple Leafs, 11 in front.
Two quarterfinal berths should prove enough to avoid the re-qualification tournament, an 8-team affair at May's England 7s. The US has posted a 3-12 record in its last 3 outings, yet twice reached the top 8, collecting 21 points.
This suggests Alex Magleby's squad is sufficiently capable and even building momentum. Whatever the outcome of 2013's remaining 15 to 18 matches, the reflexive perspective may again focus on individual players.
In assessing a 7-month, 9-tournament campaign, however, scrutiny should comprehend USARFU's off-site residency program at the Olympic Training Center, particularly its premise that contracting a squad of 20 or so is the most effective way to get the most from America's playing base. The matter extends past the coach to the union's technical program and ultimately all the way to the board room.
Qualifying for the Olympics is vital. To do that we need to be on the circuit next year. So if we drop out by a couple of points wouldn't it be ironic that that two crazy point losing decisions will go down to an Australian.
Posted by: Waltzing Matil-dunce | 11 February 2013 at 07:20
The Hume kicking issue is more of a symptom of a greater problem -- that our kickers are consistently poorer than those on top-tier 7s teams, and even as compared to our peer 7s teams.
Would love it if someone with the data can support -- or refute -- my contention that one of our weaker points is conversion kicking
The whole drama at the even of the Spain match would have mattered naught if we had of made kicks earlier in the game.
Not only that -- if the USA kickers had of made the first three conversions in the Spain game, the fourth try and conversion would have not even been necessary (as the PD would have been already in place). USA could have thus kicked to touch, and rested players before the game against Fiji.
Posted by: isp8 | 11 February 2013 at 11:05
In 2012, US average conversion was 60%, all teams average was 62%. NZ was 59%
http://www.irbplayerwelfare.com/pdfs/gameanalysis/Sevens_Analysis_2012.pdf
Posted by: Deal with it | 11 February 2013 at 11:56
Deal with it -- thanks.. Awesome analysis. I guess the Eagles aren't as bad as I thought.
So perhaps a conclusion to make here is that when you score fewer tries, the conversions are that much more vital.
On the flipside, when NZL is thumping someone five tries to nil, does anyone notice if they missed a kick or two? Probably not.
Perhaps next year, the IRB could analyze the relative position of conversion kicks. Say, between the posts, between post and 15m, 15m and 5m, 5m and touchline.
But it still might be tough to compare, given some fields are narrower than others (ahem, Vegas).
Posted by: isp8 | 11 February 2013 at 14:36
Perhaps another telling statistic is that the Eagles scored the least amount of tries of any core team (111), and less than half of NZL.
Consider further that the USA was only one of two core teams (SCO the others) to have played the entire series in the Bowl/Plate brackets.
ARG scored almost as few tries as the USA, but spent much more time in the Cup/Plate brackets, against tougher competition.
One would think that once you got into the Bowl/Shield, the scoreboard should roll over more for core teams.
And when you compare SCO to USA, they spent the whole season in Bowl/Shields, had nearly the same number of tries (SCO slightly higher), but SCO finished higher in the tables -- could SCO's conversion rate have helped? Hmm.
Posted by: isp8 | 11 February 2013 at 14:39
"Perhaps next year, the IRB could analyze the relative position of conversion kicks. Say, between the posts, between post and 15m, 15m and 5m, 5m and touchline."
I wonder if the distribution is more or less the same for all teams, or if better teams have a higher proportion of tries scored closer to the middle.
Posted by: Interesting questions | 11 February 2013 at 15:07
Grand Prix 7s cancelled. Least shocking news ever?
Posted by: Tathum rhymes with Latham | 12 February 2013 at 18:43
ever.
Posted by: College | 13 February 2013 at 06:07
All hot air I'm afraid!
Posted by: Jack Sparrow | 13 February 2013 at 07:10
Bizarre comments from the Eagle Sevens Head Coach
“There’s a lot of positives. The guys are starting to have faith in what we’re about and what we’re trying to do on the field,” said Magleby.
“Fewer guys are going rogue. They’re adjusting to what they’re supposed to be doing and they’re finding success that way. When they do that, we’re a very good team. When they don’t do that, they revert to some old bad habits, and bad things are going to happen.”
Starting to have faith?
Fewer guys are going rogue. How about nobody going rogue?
Our "elite" American rugby athletes are full of self-confidence despite their lackluster results on the field in both 15s and 7s.
Until there is much deeper pool of talent, coaches will not be able to bench for poor attitude and influence change.
And meanwhile in the head office, Super League and Grand Prix Sevens are dead. Olympic Development Camps offer a ray of hope but any success will be due to the efforts of groups like Serevi rather than anyone in Boulder.
Posted by: Deal with it | 13 February 2013 at 09:27
The head office had nothing to do with Super League or Grand Prix (?). And I was told the ODPs were Luke Gross and Mags's idea...
Posted by: FYI | 13 February 2013 at 12:08
Nigel Melville and USAr sold to Grand Prix the exclusive rights to domestic 7's events. This pissed off the IRB and USA Sevens, excellent partners to USAr. The USAr-Grand Prix contact is all poorly worded and can be read to be expansive beyond its original intention. After all, what does the rights to "pro" sevens mean? Whatever the courts decide its means. This is where it will likely end up like all USAr business dealings. So Bill Tatham isn't going away anytime soon.
Boulder is neck deep in Bill Tatham and the Grand Prix mess.
Posted by: sevens | 13 February 2013 at 12:36
The agreement that gave Tatham the right to a pro 7s league in the US came about in 2005 so I believe it predates Nigel & the current Board set-up.
I'm sure some of the brighter lights currently occupying seats in Congress were probably involved in the decision back then though.
Posted by: Show Me The IRB Money | 13 February 2013 at 13:47
Correct the original agreement was done by Bob Latham and Doug Arnot, but it was renewed by none other than Nigel Melville and the current Board.
Posted by: sevens | 13 February 2013 at 14:55
@Deal With It
What do you expect when you hire a guy that was last coaching a club sports team full of highly educated kids to take on these types of athletes? He's over his head.
Posted by: Reality Check | 13 February 2013 at 15:39
So if foreign coaches are bad and college coaches are not good enough, where is a decent Sevens coach going to come from? What is the path for an elite Sevens rugby coach in the US?
Posted by: Deal with it | 14 February 2013 at 10:50
Who said foreign coaches are bad for 7s? I think James Walker would be a good candidate to coach the Eagles 7s team.
Posted by: Reality Check | 14 February 2013 at 11:53
Reality Check,
Are you the same guy who was suggesting Tolkin was "over his head" [sic] back in October?
Something tells me Deal with it's logic is over your head.
Posted by: Grammar School | 14 February 2013 at 11:57
If Tietjens and Magelby traded jobs today, then....(fill in the blank)....
> I don't think Isles makes the team.
> USA consistently beats 2nd tier 7s teams (POR,SPA,CAN,SCO).
Posted by: SD Hitman | 14 February 2013 at 13:22
Looks like the Varsity Cup has already fallen on it's face before a single ball was passed, kicked or contested. Playing the final at the BYU South Field is a joke. The brackets are all set for a BYU vs. Cal final and it is going from the state of the art Rio Tinto Stadium with a capacity of 20K to a place that holds 2500 unless you put in temp bleachers. Oh yeah, you can have people sit up on a hill or something too.
ESPN must be licking their chops!
Posted by: BYU got to be kidding! | 14 February 2013 at 15:49
Yea those 4-5k crowds at BYU suck. I'm betting that the VC will sell 20,000 total tickets at the 5 venues.
I'm betting that the total ticket sales from the USAr college playoffs and final will be under 3000.
Posted by: vc fan | 14 February 2013 at 16:19
Hasn't the USAR D1 championship been played before 10K plus the last couple of years?
The VC is not an improvement on the previous competition. At least three of these teams have no business being in an "elite" competition.
It's a joke.
Posted by: let it snow ... | 14 February 2013 at 16:37
The reason Jack Clark wanted out of the CPD was because after one year, which included a final in the Rio Tinto Stadium in front of 10K+ people, he felt that the commercial potential of the competition was not being properly leveraged. Now the new BYU lead Varsity Cup seems to be taking a step backwards from the CPD's first year. Of course the main reason Jack Clark didn't like it is because USA Rugby didn't share the ticket revenue with the teams. So now he is going to be flying his team across the country to Annapolis, Maryland and then to BYU for the final. He gets a home match against probably Dartmouth, but that's not going to produce massive revenue. It is most likely not going to get broadcast because if they had a sponsor that would be what they would be doing (sponsor pays for the production costs to get broadcaster and thus TV exposure). Not sure where all the sizzle is on this Varsity Cup.
Posted by: BYU got to be kidding! | 14 February 2013 at 17:30
Given the use of college logos in the Varsity Cup materials, I am guessing revenue sharing with the colleges was negotiated up front and Cal likes the new deal better than the last championship structure. On TV, a full 2,500 person stadium looks much better than a half full 20,000 stadium. Look at the minor college football bowls where tickets sales are small compared to TV revenue. USAR is trying to replicate the CRC format in 15s by selecting a few key brands. The Varsity Cup may not have TV coverage and sponsors yet, but expect USAR to try to get Varsity Cup coverage as part of a package with other properties like Eagles matches. Regional TV networks like the PAC12 Network may also pick up Varsity Cup as they are starved for content.
Posted by: Deal with it | 14 February 2013 at 18:05
My guess is that it is not going to be on TV. The typical minor sport sponsorship goes like this:
1) Sponsor is secured with terms that include covering the production costs to broadcast the event (this may include paying the costs to get the athletes there, but for sure covers the cost to get a production company to film the event and the costs to secure the venue).
2) Event organizers go to the networks to secure broadcast of the event.
3) The sponsor has their brand all over the event and the broadcast of the event (i.e. Old Navy Rugby Varsity Cup).
My guess is that it is going to be webcast.
Posted by: BYU got to be kidding! | 14 February 2013 at 18:25
The Varsity Cup is good try and i think we should all give it a couple of years. The problem is that sponsors and broadcasters are only interested in the spring and they are only interested in sevens really. So what may need to happen is 15's gets played in the fall and Sevens in the spring. That way, the CRC will be a real championship too.
But what happens when the USA doesn't qualify for the Olympics?
Then we will all be back at the balloon park with the girls D2 teams dry-humping in their match warm-ups.
But we would have tried.
Posted by: Better to have loved and lost... | 14 February 2013 at 19:41
You had me at "ballon park", but lost me with bringing it back to the Rugby Chapter of the He-Man Woman Haters Club.
Posted by: isp8 | 17 February 2013 at 07:21